Who’s Responsible Here? Establishing Legal Responsibility in the Fissured Workplace
By Tanya Goldman and David Weil
Institute for New Economic Thinking
This article proposes a new “Concentric Circle framework” which would improve workers’ access to civil, labor, and employment rights.
The nature of work is changing, with workers enduring increasingly precarious working conditions without any safety net. In response, this Article proposes a new “Concentric Circle framework” which would improve workers’ access to civil, labor, and employment rights.
Many businesses, including app-based platforms, have restructured toward “fissured workplace” business models. They treat workers like employees (specifying behaviors and closely monitoring outcomes) but they classify workers as independent contractors (engaging them at an arms-length and cutting them off from rights and benefits tied to employment). These arrangements confound legal classifications of “employment” and expose deficiencies with existing workplace protections, which are based on “employment relationships.” As a result, a growing number of workers lack both bargaining power and critical workpalce rights and benefits.
We propose a Concentric Circle framework to better govern workers’ rights in the modern era. At the core, we maintain that certain rights and protections should not be tethered to an employment relationship, but to work itself. Thus, the right to be compensated for work and paid a minimum wage; freedom from discrimination and retaliation; access to a safe working environment, and the right to associate and engage in concerted activity should belong to all workers, not just employees. Second, as a middle circle, we argue for a rebuttable presumption of employment to address those rights that remain exclusive to employees (and not independent contractors), and we propose an updated legal test of employment. Finally, at the outer ring of the framework, we suggest policies that could enhance workers’ access to benefits that promote worker mobility and social welfare.
Other scholarship has focused exclusively on either independent contractors or employees, or it has proposed a new category of worker altogether. We contend that this comprehensive framework better assigns rights, responsibilities, and protections in the modern workplace than do current legal doctrines or alternative proposals.
workers,” by Timothy B. Lee, Ars Technica, 3.2.20. Read.
by Meghan McCarty Carino, Marketplace.org, 2.26.20. Read.
by Ben Penn, Bloomberg Law, 2.26.20. Read.
by Cheryl Bolen, Bloomberg Law, 2.24.20. Read.
Economy,” Testimony by David Weil at the US House Labor and
Education Committee hearing on 10/23/20. Watch.
“At all costs: Economic precariousness & individual and social health,”
by Marguerita Cruz-Urbanc, The Smart Set, 2.6.20. Read.
StarTribune, 1.27.20. Read.
Bloomberg Law, 1.13.20. Read.
“Recognizing the ‘Present of Work’ in Setting Future Workplace Policies,” The American Prospect as part of a section entitled “The Future of Real Jobs: Part 2,” with contributions by Steven Greenhouse, Larry Mishel, Katherine Stone, and David Weil. Read.
“The Future of Real Jobs: A Prospect Roundtable,” by Robert Kuttner, John Schmitt, Heidi Shierholz, and David Weil, The American Prospect, 5.14.19. Read.
“Ratcheting Up Workplace Protections,” by David Weil, 4.1.19. The University of Pennsylvania Regulatory Review. Read.
To access more articles, please visit our current News page.